We recently reported on the UA Europe survey about tools and technologies of interest in technical documentation. Now the tekom, the German professional association for technical documentation, published the key figures for the German technical communication industry for 2015.
In the UA Europe survey,* more than 20 % of the participants named DITA as their technology of interest, followed by HTML5 and Responsive Design. Click to read our blog article about the UA Europe survey.
The tekom figures** also show that formal structures are widely used in technical documentation. Only 30-35 % of the interviewed companies do not use them. Formal structures in this context mean both XML structure definitions and non-technical standardization structures, such as Funktionsdesign® or Information Mapping®.
Contrary to the UA survey, only 9.4 % of the interviewed software companies and 4.1 % of the industrial companies use DITA.
Funktionsdesign® turns out to be the most popular structuring standard of the industrial companies, followed by custom XML structure definitions.
The following matrix shows that DITA is not a leading standard in the German-speaking countries. If it is used, it is preferred by software companies.
Unfortunately, the tekom survey did not include the tools used in technical documentation. It would have been interesting to compare the figures. UA Europe showed MadCap Flare with 32 % as the leading tool.
What about you? Do you use a structuring standard like Information Mapping® or Funktionsdesign® and/or XML-based documentation? And if XML, which standard do you use?