Technologies of interest in technical documentation: results of two surveys

We recently reported on the UA Europe survey about tools and technologies of interest in technical documentation. Now the tekom, the German professional association for technical documentation, published the key figures for the German technical communication industry for 2015.

In the UA Europe survey,* more than 20 % of the participants named DITA as their technology of interest, followed by HTML5 and Responsive Design. Click to read our blog article about the UA Europe survey.

UAEurope Technology2015Technology of interest 2015. © UA Europe

The tekom figures** also show that formal structures are widely used in technical documentation. Only 30-35 % of the interviewed companies do not use them. Formal structures in this context mean both XML structure definitions and non-technical standardization structures, such as Funktionsdesign® or Information Mapping®.

Contrary to the UA survey, only 9.4 % of the interviewed software companies and 4.1 % of the industrial companies use DITA.

Funktionsdesign® turns out to be the most popular structuring standard of the industrial companies, followed by custom XML structure definitions.

tekomBranchenzahlen StrukturierungsstandardsUse of structuring standards in technical documentation. Source: Branchenkennzahlen für die Technische Kommunikation 2015. © tekom 2015 – Dr. Daniela Straub

The following matrix shows that DITA is not a leading standard in the German-speaking countries. If it is used, it is preferred by software companies.

tekomBranchenzahlen DITARelevanzHow important is DITA in technical documentation? Source: Branchenkennzahlen für die Technische Kommunikation 2015. © tekom 2015 – Dr. Daniela Straub

Unfortunately, the tekom survey did not include the tools used in technical documentation. It would have been interesting to compare the figures. UA Europe showed MadCap Flare with 32 % as the leading tool.

What about you? Do you use a structuring standard like Information Mapping® or Funktionsdesign® and/or XML-based documentation? And if XML, which standard do you use?

Sources:

* UA Europe
** Branchenkennzahlen für die Technische Kommunikation 2015. © tekom 2015 – Dr. Daniela Straub

 

Blog

tcworld 2018: What's New with iiRDS?

iiRDS was one of the central topics at the tcworld conference 2018: at the new iiRDS Café, in lectures, showcases, and tutorials. There was also a discussion on Twitter, among other things about the name, which is so difficult to pronounce. more ...

tcworld 2018 part 3: Creative online videos for technical documentation

Clear the stage! At the beginning of his workshop "Creating thrilling online videos", Stephan Schneider showed two pictures. more ...

tcworld 2018 part 2: Virtual and actual highlights

The sun is shining brightly as I arrive for my first tekom. Inside, the conference is already in full swing. Two days of presentations, workshops, fair impressions and conversations await. more ...

tcworld 2018 part 1: Legal Requirements vs Readability

At this year's tcworld conference, there were a lot of discussions about standards and regulations for technical documentation. Experts such as Jens-Uwe Heuer-James and Torsten Gruchmann came together for a panel discussion where the following was repeatedly said: "We need an IEC 82079-1!" more ...

Working in self-organizing teams. Or: how we get rid of management

Today's world is VUCA : volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous. Companies are facing complex challenges such as Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things. Those who do not respond fast, may be driven out of the market. more ...
  • linkedin
  • xing